Kubuntu Council Elections

The Kubuntu Council is a group of 6 Kubuntu Members who get to vote on membership to Kubuntu Members and occationally other decisions regarding Kubuntu.

Half the council recently came to the end of their 2 year appointment so we need to hold elections for the open positions to the council. This could be you! If you are a Kubuntu Member and are willing to turn up to kubuntu meetings as much as possible for the next couple of years do consider putting your name forward.

As well as being into Kubuntu I feel it’s a good idea to have one or more council members who have strong links with upstream KDE so if you are into upstream do consider putting your name forward too.

To put your name forward make sure you update your wiki page then post to this list.

You can also nominate someone else by posting to this list. Might be a good idea to chat to them first of course.

Closing date for nominations is in a week, so Monday 14 June.

[Discuss the Kubuntu Council Elections on the Forum]

Originally sent to the kubuntu-devel Mailing List by Jonathan Riddell on Mon Jun 7 10:43:20 BST 2010

Maverick Alpha 1 released

"When he was a young warthog
He found his aroma lacked a certain appeal
He could clear the savannah after every meal

Hakuna! It means no worries
For the rest of your days
It’s our problem-free philosophy"

— Timon the Meerkat, "Hakuna Matata", "The Lion King", Disney

Welcome to Maverick Meerkat Alpha 1, which will in time become Ubuntu 10.10.

Pre-releases of Maverick are *not* encouraged for anyone needing a stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running into occasional, even frequent breakage. They are, however, recommended for Ubuntu developers and those who want to help in testing, reporting, and fixing bugs.

Alpha 1 is the first in a series of milestone CD images that will be released throughout the Maverick development cycle. The Alpha images are known to be reasonably free of showstopper CD build or installer bugs, while representing a very recent snapshot of Maverick. You can download it here:

http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/maverick/alpha-1/ (Ubuntu)
http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/releases/maverick/alpha-1/ (Ubuntu Server for UEC and EC2)
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/maverick/alpha-1/ (Kubuntu)
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/maverick/alpha-1/ (Xubuntu)
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/maverick/alpha-1/ (Ubuntu Studio)

See http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Mirrors for a list of mirrors.

Alpha 1 includes a number of software updates that are ready for wider testing. Please refer to http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/maverick/alpha1 for information on changes in Ubuntu.

This is quite an early set of images, so you should expect some bugs. For a list of known bugs (that you don’t need to report if you encounter), please see:

http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/maverick/alpha1

If you’re interested in following the changes as we further develop Maverick, have a look at the maverick-changes mailing list:

http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/maverick-changes

We also suggest that you subscribe to the ubuntu-devel-announce list if you’re interested in following Ubuntu development. This is a low-traffic list (a few posts a week) carrying announcements of approved specifications, policy changes, alpha releases, and other interesting events.

http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce

Bug reports should go to the Ubuntu bug tracker:

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs

[Discuss Maverick Alpha 1 on the Forum]

Originally sent to the ubuntu-devel-announce Mailing List by Colin Watson on Thu Jun 3 17:03:52 BST 2010

Alpha 1 ISO Testing!

As Martin Pitt announced, Maverick main archive is frozen for Alpha 1.

As usual we’ll be asking everyone on the QA team to participate in the image testing to ensure we have good test coverage.

Due to a critical kernel bug, we won’t be having desktop images for Alpha 1, but we still have to test the alternates and server images.

The procedures for testing ISO images and reporting results are explained on

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Procedures

Test results will be tracked on

http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/

You may have accounts on the tracker from last time. Please register if you are new to this or ask me if you need to know your login or have your password reset 🙂

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

We will coordinate testing in #ubuntu-testing on freenode. Please, go there often to see what others are testing or what needs to be tested.

Thank you very much for your help and happy testing!

Originally posted to the ubuntu-qa mailing list by Ara Pulido on Tue Jun 1 08:41:47 BST 2010

Linaro: Accelerating Linux on ARM

At our last UDS in Belgium it was notable how many people were interested in the ARM architecture. There have always been sessions at UDS about lightweight environments for the consumer electronics and embedded community, but this felt tangibly different. I saw questions being asked about ARM in server and cloud tracks, for example, and in desktop tracks. That’s new.

So I’m very excited at today’s announcement of Linaro, an initiative by the ARM partner ecosystem including Freescale, IBM, Samsung, ST-Ericsson and TI, to accelerate and unify the field of Linux on ARM. That is going to make it much easier for developers to target ARM generally, and build solutions that can work with the amazing diversity of ARM hardware that exists today.

The ARM platform has historically been superspecialized and hence fragmented – multiple different ARM-based CPU’s from multiple different ARM silicon partners all behaved differently enough that one needed to develop different software for each of them. Boot loaders, toolchains, kernels, drivers and middleware are all fragmented today, and of course there’s additional fragmentation associated with Android vs mainline on ARM, but Linaro will go a long way towards cleaning this up and making it possible to deliver a consistent platform experience across all of the major ARM hardware providers.

Having played with a prototype ARM netbook, I was amazed at how cool it felt. Even though it was just a prototype it was super-thin, and ran completely cool. It felt like a radical leap forward for the state of the art in netbooks. So I’m a fan of fanless computing, and can’t wait to get one off the shelf ':-)'

For product developers, the big benefit from Linaro will be reduced time to market and increased choice of hardware. If you can develop your software for “linux on ARM”, rather than a specific CPU, you can choose the right hardware for your project later in the development cycle, and reduce the time required for enablement of that hardware. Consumer electronics product development cycles should drop significantly as a result. That means that all of us get better gadgets, sooner, and great software can spread faster through the ecosystem.

Linaro is impressively open: www.linaro.org has details of open engineering summits, an open wiki, mailing lists etc. The teams behind the work are committed to upstreaming their output so it will appear in all the distributions, sooner or later. The images produced will all be royalty free. And we’re working closely with the Linaro team, so the cadence of the releases will be rigorous, with a six month cycle that enables Linaro to include all work that happens in Ubuntu in each release of Linaro. There isn’t a “whole new distribution”, because a lot of the work will happen upstream, and where bits are needed, they will be derived from Ubuntu and Debian, which is quite familiar to many developers.

The nature of the work seems to break down into four different areas.

First, there are teams focused on enabling specific new hardware from each of the participating vendors. Over time, we’ll see real convergence in the kernel used, with work like Grant Likely’s device tree forming the fabric by which differences can be accommodated in a unified kernel. As an aside, we think we can harness the same effort in Ubuntu on other architectures as well as ARM to solve many of the thorny problems in linux audio support.

Second, there are teams focused on the middleware which is common to all platforms: choosing APIs and ensuring that those are properly maintained and documented so that people can deliver any different user experience with best-of-breed open tools.

Third, there are teams focused on advancing the state of the art. For example, these teams might accelerate the evolution of the compiler technology, or the graphics subsystem, or provide new APIs for multitouch gestures, or geolocation. That work benefits the entire ecosystem equally.

And finally, there are teams aimed at providing out of the box “heads” for different user experiences. By “head” we mean a particular user experience, which might range from the minimalist (console, for developers) to the sophisticated (like KDE for a netbook). Over time, as more partners join, the set of supported “heads” will grow – ideally in future you’ll be able to bring up a Gnome head, or a KDE head, or a Chrome OS head, or an Android head, or a MeeGo head, trivially. We already have goot precedent for this in Ubuntu with support for KDE, Gnome, LXE and server heads, so everyone’s confident this will work well.

The diversity in the Linux ecosystem is fantastic. In part, Linaro grows that diversity: there’s a new name that folks need to be aware of and think about. But importantly, Linaro also serves to simplify and unify pieces of the ecosystem that have historically been hard to bring together. If you know Ubuntu, then you’ll find Linaro instantly familiar: we’ll share repositories to a very large extent, so things that “just work” in Ubuntu will “just work” with Linaro too.

[Discuss Linaro: Accelerating Linux on ARM on the Forums]

Originally posted on Mark Shuttleworth’s Blog by Mark Shuttleworth on Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

Kernel Team Meeting Minutes – June 1st, 2010

Meeting Minutes

IRC Log of the meeting.

Agenda

2010-6-1 Meeting Agenda

Maverick Release Metrics

Bugs

Alpha 1 Milestoned Bugs (0) Release Targeted Bugs (40 accross all packages)
linux 0 5

Blueprints

  • 14 Blueprints (includes HWE blueprints)

Bugs with Patches Attached: 130 (down 2 from last week)

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-apparmor (jjohansen)

Nothing new this week.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-firewire-stack (manjo)

Nothing new this week.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-misc (apw)

There are two outstanding items for Alpha-1, getting mainline builds to include linux-tools and progressing the -preempt pakcages. These are both non-release tasks. The first is likely to slip to alpha-2 now, the second is progresing but also likely to slip.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-new-kernel-on-lts (tgardner)

LTS backport kernel and meta package are in the kernel-ppa. Its tracking maverick as its released.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-pv-ops-ec2-kernel (jjohansen)

Slow progress, more testing without success. Will have to try pv-ops on HVM drivers this week.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-tracing-support (cnd)

Kernel config is set, confirmed with upstream. No new work other than that yet.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-ubuntu-delta-review (ogasawara)

There are only two work items still open for Alpha-1, both of which are not critical for Alpha-1’s release.

apw, manjo: if you don’t think you’ll get to those before Thurs, I’ll move them under the Alpha-2 milestone.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-union-mounts (apw)

Still no testing feedback from foundations on union-mounts, there is talk of another drop occuring from upstream which will simplify the patches. It is unclear when this new drop will occur however.

We also have an issue with aufs2 in maverick which is leading to aufs2 panics during boot on the live-cd. I have an update for aufs2 which I am attempting to test to see if that fixes the issues. It is likely we will have to update aufs2 as soon as we are on 2.6.35-rcN. The update does appear to be good, and we are being asked to respin with aufs2 updated. Will get patches out shortly.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bug-handling (jfo)

Continuing work on the wiki pages with input from apw, ogasawara and smb. I plan to send some e-mail out on the ongoing effort today.

Also, I have some prep work happening that will move several topics to INPROGRESS.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-upstart (apw)

We have patches pending for the remaining Alpha-1 deliverable, waiting on testing from Foundations. These would most readily be applied post Alpha-1.

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-reducing-dkms-packages-required-for-hardware-enablement (cking)

Nothing new this week

Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bios-test-automation (cking)

 
 *  Added functionality:
    *   Test for common BIOS error messages
    *   APIC edge/level trigger test
    *   acpiinfo: common kernel log ACPI checks
    *   Common S3/S4 PM kernel error checks
    *   S3 multiple suspend/resume cycle tests
    *   S4 hibernate/resume test
    *   Add in test run order/priority
    *   Rework kernel log scanning + execution of some user space tools
    *   Rework wakealarm code into common library calls
    *   Add ability to take pre-captured input from dmidecode, /proc/acpi/dsdt and dmesg 
rather than at run time
    *   Manoj added a test from the test suite into kernel-qa dev to prove the test suite 
integrates in okay.

Status: Maverick (ogasawara)

We uploaded the 2.6.34-5.12 Alpha 1 kernel last Friday. There will be no further uploads until after Thurs. Unfortunately the first iso’s were just spun yesterday and have uncovered 2 bugs we need to be aware of (thanks apw and tgardner for already taking ownership):

I should take that back, we might upload for the aufs bits. Also note that 2.6.35-rc1 was released so I’ll be rebasing Maverick today.

Security & bugfix kernels – Karmic/Jaunty/Intrepid/Hardy/Others (gnarl/smb)

 
 * Dapper:      2.6.15-55.83  (updates)
 * Hardy:       2.6.24-27.69  (updates)
 * Intrepid:    --- End of Support ---
 * Jaunty:      2.6.28-18.60  (updates)
 * Karmic:      2.6.31-21.59  (updates)
    - mvl-dove  2.6.31-213.27 (updates)
    - fsl-imx51 2.6.31-111.27 (updates)
    - ec2       2.6.31-306.14 (updates)
 * Lucid:       2.6.32-22.33  (updates)
    - mvl-dove  2.6.32-204.16 (release)
    - fsl-imx51 2.6.31-607.13 (release)
    - ti-omap   2.6.33-500.6  (release)
    - qcm-msm   2.6.31-800.2  (release)
    - ec2       2.6.32-305.9  (release)

Status unchanged from last week. Security release nearly out (probably tomorrow).

Incoming Bugs and Regression Stats

Incoming Bugs:

Version Count
Maverick 5 (+1)
Lucid 1005 (-129)

Current regression stats:

Version Potential Update Release Proposed
maverick 5 (+2)      
lucid 262 (-40;) 26 (+1) 146 (-3) 1
karmic   9 50 1
jaunty   5 20  
hardy   1 (-1) 3  

Incoming Bugs: Bug day report (JFo)

This week’s Bug Day will be on Thursday. I plan to send out an announcement for it later today with a reminder going out tomorrow. The current plan is to review Bugs with Patches attached to eliminate misreported patches and prepare the list for team review. Additionally, i will resume our use of the ‘cherry-pick’ tag to identify bugs with upstream commit SHA1s in them for us to review and react accordingly. You can see the list of these from this url

Open Discussion or Questions: Anyone have anything? (raise your hand please)

jfo Just wanted to draw your attention here
 
bjf Pointing to here
 
apw Remember we discussed the b43 driver not working, i’ve confirmed that it does not work in the current release kernel in lucid due to dma errors, etc.
  With smb’s latest stable 32.13 the b43 does work pretty well, and i am using it now
tgardner Is compat-wireless any better?
apw Can’t say i’ve tried it no

[Discuss Kernel Team Meeting Minutes – June 1st, 2010 on the Forums]

Originally posted to the Canonical Voices -Kernel Team Blog by Brad Figg on Wed, June 2nd, 2010